Comments on: PROOF POINTS: Asian American students lose more points in an AI essay grading study — but researchers don’t know why

By: KELLY LOGAN

KELLY LOGAN — Wed, 10 Jul 2024 03:50:12 +0000

Looking at the data I noticed that Hispanic and Black student were still marked more harshly by AI than others. Their AI marks were only 73 percent of the human-graded marks, while Asian and Indigenous recieved 75 percent and mixed race and white students 77 percent. In other words, the difference for Asian students looked greater because their scores were larger to begin with. Nonetheless, there is obviously still racial bias in AI but it simply reinforces the human bias already present.

By: TK Amman

TK Amman — Tue, 09 Jul 2024 17:14:38 +0000

I don’t think that teachers should use AI for grading essays. Perhaps I am a relic too, but I think the AI grader does not catch subtlety or ironic humor in writing. That said, I am a Ph.D. who tutors Asian American students and their writing may well be superior. These kids not only work hard in school, but take tutorials beyond the classroom, most often in writing. Even when I was in college at U.Va. Asian-American students were often harder working and earned better grades. And for catching plagiarism, I think a teacher needs to know their students’ writing at all levels of progress. I have caught several plagiarists and cheaters (there is a difference) by assessing both raw writing and a portfolio of student writing in different areas. Teachers that allow an AI to grade are lazy and it makes sense considering the low pay and lack of respect teachers receive. If you want to improve your education system, stop denying tenure and pay academics what they are worth. There are also tenured teachers at high schools. The way we are approaching education will prove a detriment to student progress and the education and intelligence of American students. It is a shame!

By: DuWayne Krause

DuWayne Krause — Mon, 08 Jul 2024 11:58:10 +0000

Call me a relic, from the past, but AI scoring seems too impersonal. As a math teacher, I love my subject. I like correcting papers. It gives me a “feel” for my students’ performance. I can see their approaches. I can see their understanding, or lack of understanding. If a machine is doing your grading, you get none of that. The teacher becomes a faceless clerk, in a store.